Experiencing MOOCs

Over the last couple of months, I’ve been enrolled in a couple of MOOCs. They are great for a learning addict like me – I have to stop myself from browsing the Coursera course list all the time, in order to prevent nervous break down: there’s no way I can possibly learn all that in one life time, and that annoys me deeply.

Anyway, as I said, I did enrol in a few courses, and the experiences differed quite a bit. I dropped out of one course (Open Education at The Open University), another one was suspended indefinitely due to technical problems (Fundamentals of Online Education at Georgia Institute of Technology, through Coursera) and I successfully completed the last one (e-Learning and Digital Cultures at the University of Edinburgh, also through Coursera).

So that’s a 50% success rate. I mean, it’s not my fault that the one course on planning and designing Online Education had problems with their, ehm, design? It was quite shocking though, to learn that this precisely this course wasn’t continued due to difficulty with the way it was set up… But alas, it’s still very early stages for MOOCs, and I think at least the people who set this one up have learned from it…

Back to the MOOCs I did follow. How come I dropped out of one, and completed the other one with quite good results? I think it has something to do with the design, the sense of being monitored and the work load – not necessarily in that order.

With design, I mean not so much the course design, but more the visual lay out of the platform in which the course is delivered. The big difference between the two platforms was in their set up. I found it quite difficult to navigate the Open University course: the menu wasn’t always logical, the type face was pretty small, the page set up made me feel that I wasn’t entirely ‘in’ the course, and it took quite some time for pages to load, which made me lose focus. All in all, you could say that the user interface for this course contributed to me not paying attention.

But surely I’m used to not brilliant websites, you’d say? So I reckon the interface is not the only reason I dropped out. I also felt that this MOOC was just too big for me. Spending some 100 hours on this course in 7 weeks – I just couldn’t find the time to do it properly. And it did feel, with this course, that you were either in or out. It wasn’t easy to browse through some of the learning objects and pick ’n choose your way, maybe also because of the not so friendly interface. I realised that maybe the e-Learning and Digital Cultures course was do-able, because you could easily browse the objects, picking items that appealed to you. Because of the way the final assignment was set up (produce a digital artefact that ‘expresses, for you, something important about one or more of the themes we have covered during the course’), you could focus on a topic that you wanted to explore further. That really helped in staying engaged.

Last but not least, I must admit that I almost didn’t even start the e-Learning and Digital Cultures course… If it hadn’t been for an online friend pointing out the many great resources, I wouldn’t have started it in week three (or was it four?). And once I started to engage, I felt I couldn’t drop out now that my friend had just gotten me in… In one MOOC I did last year, the feeling of being monitored came from the weekly tests – you had to keep up in order not to drop out, and that gave you the feeling of somebody noticing if you would drop out. So for me, apparently it helps if someone is paying attention to my studying.

Having learned this, I’m pretty curious what my next MOOC-experience will bring me. Because, with an addict like me, one thing is pretty sure: there will be more MOOCs.

Open education is…

For me, open education (or any kind of education, actually), revolves around three key elements: the learner, his lecturer (teacher, professor) and the content which they interact with. I think this is captured in this venn diagram (made with creately.com).

 

Happy new MOOC

Having just finished the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC on Coursera (my second MOOC after one on Gamification), I stumbled upon this one by the Open University. I just couldn’t help myself, I had to enroll. It’s so exciting to be able to learn more about (online) education and connect with learners all over the world.

As a lecturer (I lecture on Publishing and Crossmedia Concepts at the University of Applied Sciences in Amsterdam) I try to keep up with innovations in learning. I’ve been researching the way lecturers would like to use eTextbooks, and that topic relates closely to issues that have to do with open education and OER. Hope this MOOC will bring my knowledge of both to the next level.

(#h817open, activity 1)

Digital artefact

The Museum of Education (artwork by Roy Rösken)

As a student in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on eLearning and Digital Cultures, I was challenged to make a digital artefact, that ‘… expresses a question, an idea, a problem, a hope, a worry or a provocation that the course has raised …’.

The first part of the course was about utopias and dystopias, and the second part looked into what it means to be human in a digital culture, and what that means for education. For some time, I’ve been using a metaphor that captures my utopian view of how we could look at education in this digital time, in which we have a huge collection of rich learning materials available at our fingertips. I hope this video helps to get my metaphor across…

Back to Berlin!

Voor het derde jaar op rij was ik eind november in Berlijn. Niet om te genieten van Kerstmarkten, Glühwein en broodjes Weisswurst (hoewel ook die langskwamen), maar voor Online Educa Berlin, een enorm groot e-learningcongres waar meer dan 2000 mensen uit 95 landen op af komen.

In actie

Hoewel ik dus wist waar ik naartoe ging, was Educa dit jaar voor mij heel anders dan de twee voorgaande edities. In 2010 en 2011 was ik namelijk ‘gewoon’ bezoeker; dit jaar stond ik voor het eerst als spreker op de lijst. Hoe dat zo kwam?

Tsja, een fijne collega en ik besloten ergens eind mei dat het best stoer zou zijn om zelf een bijdrage te leveren aan de conferentie. We bedachten wat voor ons de sleutel in het werken met e-learning is, al pratende ontstond een model, dat schreven we op en zonden we in, en in augustus kregen we bericht dat ons proposal geaccepteerd was.

Dat betekende dat ik, namens ons beiden, op de eerste dag van Online Educa het podium op mocht om ons verhaal te vertellen. We besloten het heel eenvoudig te houden,  met een duidelijke boodschap die ook meteen de titel van ons verhaal was: Not the tool, but the target. Oftewel: bij het ontwerpen van e-learning moet je niet meteen op de tool duiken, maar eerst bedenken wat het doel is, wat je wilt overbrengen. Een open deur, maar toch een die niet vaak genoeg ingetrapt kan worden.

Dat deden wij dus, die open deur intrappen. Door ons publiek te vragen of ze een ballon op wilden blazen en daarmee op een bewegend doel te mikken. Dat lukte natuurlijk niet: een ballon is niet de juiste tool… Daarna volgden enkele voorbeelden van onderwijsontwerpen waarbij wij wel of juist niet de tool centraal stelden, gevolgd door het door ons aangepaste model. Alles met als boodschap: stel de inhoud van je onderwijs, je lesdoel, centraal, en kies daaruit volgend de juiste tool.

Het klinkt allemaal doodeenvoudig, en in wezen is dat het ook, maar het was toch behoorlijk spannend om in de grootste zaal van het congres voor zo’n 180 tot 200 man op het podium te staan en dit te verkondigen. Gelukkig werd de boodschap met instemming ontvangen, en achteraf, toen de zenuwen weg waren, was het ook wel erg leuk om te doen. Dus wie weet, misschien volgend jaar weer?

Met dank aan Presentations2Go is de presentatie online te bekijken.